PDA

View Full Version : Should the USCG join the WBF ......


J. Dillon
07-06-2005, 09:07 AM
to help solve some of it's maintenance problems ?

JD

Sailing Far From Smooth
USA TODAY
July 6, 2005

KEY WEST - The 210-foot Coast Guard cutter Decisive is an imposing figure on the horizon as it slices through turquoise waters 10 miles off the Florida shore.

But from the bridge above the deck to the bilge below, Cmdr. Steve Baynes' ship is in shambles.

It's week three of a six-week patrol, and the Decisive has a fuel pump leak, a broken water heater, haphazard radar and global-positioning system, faulty air conditioning, a major hydraulic leak in a patrol boat, high-frequency radios that don't work and a broken anchor winch.


When they're not racing to make emergency repairs, members of Baynes' crew, some suffering from mold-related respiratory problems, replace the saturated rags tied around cold-water pipes that drip onto their bunks at night. They also mop up sewage that routinely backs up and floods their quarters.

In their spare time, they lift weights in a tiny laundry room where rusty washers and dryers hum and a wall-mounted thermometer reads 100 degrees.

And they labor over machine tools, making parts from scratch for mechanical equipment so old that the manufacturers have long since gone out of business.

Coast Guard officers such as Baynes and the men and women they lead have been contending with such problems for years.

While the average age of the Navy's frigates, destroyers and other "surface combatants" is 15.2 years, and the average age of its supply and refueling ships is 20.5 years, the Coast Guard uses ships nearly twice as old, according to the Government Accountability Office. The average age of the Coast Guard's 14 210-foot cutters is 37.3 years, and the average age of its dozen 378-foot cutters is 35.3 years.

"It's just getting more and more difficult to keep these old dogs going," says Baynes, commander of the Decisive's 75-member crew.

The Coast Guard's unofficial motto is "We can do more with less."

"As admirable as that stance is," Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, says, "the cold, hard truth remains that the Coast Guard is experiencing a record number of casualties and mishaps like never seen before, and it's becoming simply unsafe for our young men and women to serve aboard these aging assets."

Given the Coast Guard's new anti-terrorism duties, "it's a disgraceful state of affairs," says maritime security expert Stephen Flynn, a former Coast Guard officer.

With homeland security added to the Coast Guard's responsibilities, security experts and members of Congress say it's time to give the Coast Guard the tools it needs to help protect the nation. They're pushing to speed up a 20- to 25-year, multibillion-dollar program to replace the Coast Guard's "deepwater" fleet, the 88 large ships and 186 aircraft capable of operating many miles offshore.

New mission

The Decisive has been patrolling U.S. waters for nearly 40 years. In the 1970s, it enforced fishing zones in the frigid waters off northern New England. In the 1980s and '90s, it was based in Florida, where the crew seized more than 125 tons of cocaine and marijuana and rescued more than 2,500 Haitian and Cuban migrants trying to get to the USA.

Today, the Decisive mostly patrols Caribbean waters, sometimes a few hundred miles offshore, as part of what has become the Coast Guard's most important mission: protecting the nation from terrorism.

That work is being compromised by a fleet that was well beyond its prime even before the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

Last summer, the 9/11 Commission reported, "While commercial aviation remains a possible target, terrorists may turn their attention to other modes. Opportunities to do harm are as great, or greater, in maritime or surface transportation."

The Coast Guard, which became part of the Homeland Security Department in 2003, is responsible for stopping terrorists who could try to smuggle weapons of mass destruction into the USA through its ports.

In addition to its traditional missions of boat safety, migrant and drug interdiction and fisheries enforcement, the maritime military service must board and inspect cargo ships bound for U.S. ports, share intelligence about threats and possible efforts to smuggle terrorists or weapons into the country, and conduct surveillance on the high seas.

Like much of the Coast Guard's "deepwater" fleet, the Decisive is in very rough shape.

Baynes says its problems affect its new mission:

*About half the time, he can't send his 24-foot "over-the-horizon" boat on night patrols to look for migrants, drug smugglers or anyone trying to illegally enter the USA because the ship's high-frequency radios and Global Positioning System devices aren't working. To send six-man teams out of sight of the ship without radios and GPS would put them in too much danger, Baynes says.

*His ship often can't detect other vessels even a couple of miles away because its radar system is old and temperamental. When it goes down -- which it does at least once a day -- Baynes' crew relies on a small, inexpensive radar system available at any marine supply store for use by recreational boaters.

"We're pretty limited in figuring out who's out there and what they're doing," Baynes says.


*The communication systems are so primitive that "half the time, we can't even talk to other Coast Guard ships," he says.

*Crewmembers have to spend so much time on repairs and maintenance -- often 18 hours a day -- there's no time for training or safety classes.

"Crew fatigue is one of the biggest things I'm worried about," Baynes says.

Chief engineer Lt. Greg Tarpey says he can't even begin to catalog all the things that have gone wrong on the Decisive since it set sail May31.

Migrant rescues

While contending with all the breakdowns, crewmembers have had to handle scores of migrants plucked out of the perilous waters. In mid-June, on the 18th day of the Decisive's latest patrol, Baynes and his crew took on 99 Cuban migrants. One group of 26 had been floating on a ramshackle boat for 21 days. When the Coast Guard found them, two were unconscious.

Baynes is mindful of what probably would have happened to the migrants if his cutter hadn't been patrolling the area. He's also mindful of the new stakes after 9/11. After 20 years in the service, he's used to the "do more with less" approach.

But the problems have become "a constant drain on us," he says. "It's going to get to where one day, I'm just going to have to call my commanders and say, 'I can't sail.'"

*"Dire situation," 1A

Alan D. Hyde
07-06-2005, 12:42 PM
Disgraceful.

But, I'm not sure the answer is building new vessels (probably at BIW, Olympia's thinking... :D ).

A substantial re-conditioning and refitting of the existing vessels certainly appears to be called for, however.

BTW, I can't imagine why we'd EVER send anyone who's escaped back to Cuba.

That's even MORE disgraceful.

Alan

Gary E
07-06-2005, 01:05 PM
Maybe the Coasties should capture and use the next '53 Chevy truck they see floating towards Key West instead of sinking it

ahp
07-06-2005, 01:58 PM
A 37.5 year old steel ship has no business on the ocean. So what is new? That the USCG gets what is left over is not new. What is new is their increased responsibilities. They were always stretched thin. Now it seems they are at the snapping point. Sad.

Bruce Hooke
07-06-2005, 02:02 PM
Originally posted by Alan D. Hyde:
But, I'm not sure the answer is building new vessels (probably at BIW, Olympia's thinking... :D ).

A substantial re-conditioning and refitting of the existing vessels certainly appears to be called for, however.What likely makes sense is to analyze the cost and service life expected for a complete overhaul versus building new. I suspect that at a certain point a complete overhaul just does not make sense financially, either because it costs as much or more than building new or because the expected service life of the rebuilt boat is just too short...

George Roberts
07-06-2005, 02:05 PM
A GPS costs under $200. I don't know what a decent radio would cost.

The Coast Guard may just want to complain in hopes of getting more government money.

Alan D. Hyde
07-06-2005, 02:36 PM
"A 37.5 year old steel ship has no business on the ocean."

Is this true? Why?

The QE2, then--- for example--- should be scrapped??? :(

Alan

Bruce Hooke
07-06-2005, 04:10 PM
Originally posted by George Roberts:
A GPS costs under $200. I don't know what a decent radio would cost.

The Coast Guard may just want to complain in hopes of getting more government money.If it was just a lack of a GPS and a radio I doubt we would be hearing about this...

Ken Hutchins
07-06-2005, 10:09 PM
I'm sure their aircraft is also just as old. :( Anybody want to risk their life on a 40 year old helicopter that has been ingesting salt water spray? :confused:

Domesticated_Mr. Know It All
07-06-2005, 11:08 PM
Maybe they should keep some of those fancy drug runner boats they seize eh?

With all the money being pumped into other countries, maybe we should take better care of the people who look out for us.

PatCassidy
07-07-2005, 12:17 AM
You can't compare a working boat with a cruise ship. The CG boats tended to face extreme conditions and, at a fraction of the size of the big liners, often went out to search for harm's way.

Andrew Craig-Bennett
07-07-2005, 10:04 AM
Cruise ships are very regularly, and expensively, refitted.

DrakeChristensen
07-07-2005, 10:16 AM
Originally posted by Mr. Know It All:

...With all the money being pumped into other countries...I'm not trying to instigate - just want to point out that it is interesting to understand the difference between what many American's (including me) believe is being spent on 'foreign aid' and what is actually being spent:
http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/BFW/graphs/aid-as-percentage-of-budget.gif

I don't know whether 1% is too little or too much - undoubtedly we'll each have opinions. But this discrepancy betwen perception and reality is interesting.

[ 07-07-2005, 10:30 AM: Message edited by: Drake ]

Bob Adams
07-07-2005, 12:33 PM
A suggested motto....We the willing, led by the unknowing, have done so much, for so long, with so little we are now qualified to do anything with nothing!